Karagiannis, Christos

2021, Karagiannis, Christos, Christos Savva, Vasileios Korakakis, Tonia Adamide, Andreas Georgiou, Ioanna Matheou, Aleka Prodromou, Theodoros Xanthos

Purpose: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) including exercise training improves muscle strength, exercise capacity, and health-related quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, the evidence of the effect of upper limb exercise training (ULET) on activities of daily living (ADL) is sparse. This study investigated the effect of two different types of ULET on ADL in addition to standard PR. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to a strength or a combined ULET group. Both groups exercised 2 d/wk for 12 wk. Outcome measures were handgrip strength and muscle strength of biceps and triceps muscles. Moreover, health-related quality of life was assessed through the COPD assessment test (CAT) and Saint George Respiratory Questionnaire. Ability to perform ADL was evaluated through an ADL simulation test. Dyspnea was evaluated by a modified Medical Research Council scale, whereas dyspnea and fatigue perception during strength and ADL tests were measured through a modified Borg scale. Results: Thirty-six patients with COPD (67.4 ± 5.3 yr) participated in the study. Significant improvements in upper limb strength and CAT were found within both groups. At the end of the study period, patients in the combined group improved time of the ADL test (P = .02) with reduced perception of fatigue (P = .03) compared with patients in the strength group. Conclusions: In addition to standard PR of patients with COPD, the combined endurance and resistance ULET program improved ADL and muscle strength, whereas resistance training only increased strength.

2020-09-02, Karagiannis, Christos, Christos Savva, Vasileios Korakakis, Ioanna Matheou, Tonia Adamide, Andreas Georgiou, Theodoros Xanthos

The purpose of this study was to investigate the intra-rater reliability and agreement of handgrip strength (HGS) measurement using a hydraulic hand dynamometer in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A sample of 19 COPD patients (18 males and 1 female; mean ± SD age, 66.9 ± 6.3 years) was evaluated using a hand dynamometer by the same rater in two different testing sessions with a 7-d interval. During each session, patients were asked to exert three maximal isometric contractions on the dominant hand and the mean value of the 3 efforts (measured in kilogram-force [Kgf]) was used for data analysis. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1), the standard error of measurement (SEM), the minimal detectable change (MDC), and Bland–Altman methods were used to estimate the degree of test–retest reliability and the measurement error, respectively. HGS in COPD patients revealed an ICC2,1 score of 0.99, suggesting excellent test–retest reliability. The calculated SEM was relatively small (0.59 Kgf), and the MDC presented a clinically acceptable value of 1.64 Kgf. These findings, in conjunction with the narrow width of the 95% limits of agreements (95% limits of agreement, −2.5–2.1 Kgf) in the Bland–Altman plot, reflected the measurement precision and the narrow variation of the differences during the 2 testing sessions. The results of this study demonstrated an excellent test–retest reliability of HGS measurement, indicating that this method is reliable for repeated monitoring of peripheral muscle strength in patients with COPD.

2020, Karagiannis, Christos, Christos Savva, Ioannis Mamais, Tonia Adamide, Andreas Georgiou, Theodoros Xanthos

2023-12, Karagiannis, Christos, Christos Savva, Vasileios Korakakis, George Ploutarchou, Tonia Adamide, Andreas Georgiou, Xanthos, Theodoros

Background: Upper limb (UL) muscle dysfunction is a common extrapulmonary manifestation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). UL muscle dysfunction is associated with muscle weakness, dyspnea, and exercise intolerance. Although upper limb exercise training (ULET) is typically incorporated in pulmonary rehabilitation programs, its effects on UL muscle strength remains unclear. Objectives: The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate the effectiveness of ULET, in UL muscle strength of people with COPD. Design: This is systematic review and meta-analysis study. Data Sources and Methods: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Protocols 2020 guidelines were used for this study. PubMed, Cochrane, CINAHL Plus and SPORTDiscus and clinicaltrials.gov registry were searched from inception to July 2022. Included studies were randomized controlled trials, assessing the effectiveness in muscle strength of ULET, compared with other types of upper or lower limb exercise or no exercise. The quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale and certainty of evidence with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach. Treatment effects of ULET were calculated using standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals. Results: Twenty-four studies, with a total sample of 882 patients, were included. Most studies were of moderate quality and high risk of bias. Very low to low certainty evidence indicates a significant difference in UL muscle strength in favor of resistance ULET, compared with lower limb exercise alone or no exercise. No significant differences were found in different types of ULET comparisons. Conclusion: The results of this review showed that resistance ULET could improve UL muscle strength in people with COPD. Most studies, however, were of moderate quality and high risk of bias. Further studies with larger sample sizes, better methodological quality, and standardized training protocols are needed to confirm these findings.