Tsioutis, Constantinos

2020-06, Tsioutis, Constantinos, Nikolaos Spernovasilis, Despo Ierodiakonou, Athanasia Milioni, Lamprini Markaki, Diamantis P. Kofteridis

Objectives: Understanding antimicrobial prescribing attitudes and perceptions, especially in the early stages of medical training, is an important driver for appropriate interventions. This study examined junior doctors’ knowledge, attitudes and perceptions regarding antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance in Greece. Methods: A self-administered, internet-based questionnaire survey was completed by trainees and residents of all primary care centres and hospitals in Crete, Greece. Results: From the 313 invited junior doctors, 214 (68.4%) fully completed the questionnaire. The mean correct knowledge score (four items) was 60%. The highest confidence rates with prescribing were recorded in accurately diagnosing an infection that needs antimicrobial treatment, selecting an appropriate administration route, and selecting the appropriate dosage. The lowest confidence rates were recorded in modifying antimicrobial treatment based on clinical and/or microbiological evidence, prescribing antimicrobial combinations and not prescribing an antimicrobial in a febrile patient without severity criteria and uncertain diagnosis of infection. Use of guidelines and expert consultation were perceived as the most important factors influencing antimicrobial prescribing practices. Most participants were aware of the antimicrobial resistance problem in Greece, and considered excessive prescribing of antimicrobials and broad-spectrum antimicrobials to be the most important causes. Availability of local and national guidelines and antimicrobial resistance data, senior consultation and infectious diseases specialist consultation were the preferred interventions to improve antimicrobial prescribing. Conclusions: The findings of this study will contribute to the design of appropriate interventions, based on local evidence, for the establishment of antimicrobial stewardship programs in a country characterised by excessive use of antimicrobials and high resistance rates.

2019-11-01, Tsioutis, Constantinos, Alberto Enrico Maraolo, David S. Y. Ong, Cansu Cimen, Philip Howard, Diamantis P. Kofteridis, Jeroen Schouten, Nico T. Mutters, Céline Pulcini

Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) and Infection prevention and control (IPC) are two key complementary strategies that combat development and spread of antimicrobial resistance. The ESGAP (ESCMID Study Group for AMS), EUCIC (European Committee on Infection Control) and TAE (Trainee Association of ESCMID) investigated how AMS and IPC activities and training are organized, if present, at national level in Europe. From February 2018 to May 2018, an internet-based cross-sectional survey was conducted through a 36-item questionnaire, involving up to three selected respondents per country, from 38 European countries in total (including Israel), belonging to the ESGAP/EUCIC/TAE networks. All 38 countries participated with at least one respondent, and a total of 81 respondents. Education and involvement in AMS programmes were mandatory during the postgraduate training of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases specialists in up to one-third of countries. IPC was acknowledged as a specialty in 32% of countries. Only 32% of countries had both guidance and national requirements regarding AMS programmes, in contrast to 61% for IPC. Formal national staffing standards for AMS and IPC hospital-based activities were present in 24% and 63% of countries, respectively. The backgrounds of professionals responsible for AMS and IPC programmes varied tremendously between countries. The organization and training of AMS and IPC in Europe are heterogeneous and national requirements for activities are frequently lacking.