Ntourakis, Dimitris

Background: Preoperative locoregional treatments (PLT) are performed to avoid progression before liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The objective of this study was to analyze the prognostic factors affecting the outcome in patients who received PLT. Material/Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent liver transplantation (LT) was performed. All patients who underwent PLT with confirmed pathological diagnosis of HCC were included. The rate of tumor necrosis (TN) was assessed by microscopic histological examination. Results: From January 1997 to December 2010, PLT was performed in 154 patients ROC analysis individuated a TN cut-off value at 40%. Ninety-one patients (59.1%) of the patients presented TN>40%. At multivariate analysis, TN<40% (HR=1.76; p=0.04) and vascular invasion (VI) (HR=2.16; p<0.01) were associated with lower Overall Survival (OS). At multivariate analysis, TN<40% (HR=1.59; p=0.001) and VI (HR=2.51; p=0.001) were significant associated with lower Disease Free Survival (DFS). One, 3 and 5 years OS was 87.9%, 82.0% and 69.1% for patients with TN>40% and 82.5%, 64.2% and 53.2% for those with TN<40% (p=0.02). Tumour size <5 cm (p=0.02); age <55 years (p=0.02); absence of VI (p=0.02) and multiple procedures (p=0.04) were predictive factors for TN>40%. Conclusions: Response to preoperative locoregional treatment can be used as potential selection criteria for LT.

Summary: Postoperative infectious complications (PICs) are associated with significant morbidity after abdominal surgery. Using multivariate analysis of data from a prospective database, our study focused on the risk factors for PICs and the prevention of these complications after hepatectomy, with the goal of improving outcomes and reducing the length of hospital stays. Background: PICs following surgery are associated with significant morbidity, increase the length of hospital stays, and have a negative impact on long-term oncological outcome. The aim of this study was to determine the risk factors for PICs following partial hepatectomy and to validate these results with an external database. Methods: Between January 2006 and December 2009, 555 patients underwent elective partial hepatectomy. We prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed demographic data, pathological variables, associated pathological conditions, and preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables. The dependent variables studied were the occurrence of PICs, defined as development of one or more of the following conditions: pneumonia, sepsis, Central line-associated bloodstream infection, urinary tract infection, wound infection, and infected intra-abdominal fluid collection. PICs were devised in medical (PIMCs) and surgical (PISCs) complications. The incidence of PICs and validation of the predictive score were determined using an external prospective database of 342 patients. Results: The multivariate analysis identified three independent risk factors for PICs: the presence of a nasogastric tube (OR = 1.8), blood transfusion (OR = 1.9), and diabetes (OR = 2.4). The multivariate analysis identified only one independent risk factor for PISCs: an associated portal venous resection (OR = 5.5). The multivariate analysis identified four independent risk factors for PIMCs: presence of a biliary drainage (OR = 1.9), blood transfusion (OR = 2.1), diabetes (OR = 2.9), and presence of atrial fibrillation (OR = 3.6). According to the three predictive factors, the observed rates of PICs ranged from 18.8 % to 77.8 % and ranged from 24.2 % to 100 % in the external database. Predicted and observed risks of PICs were not statistically different. Conclusions: The correction of modifiable risk factors among the identified factors could reduce the incidence of PICs and, as a consequence, improve patient outcomes and reduce the length of hospital stays.

Background: Recurrence remains frequent after curative-intent hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). We sought to define short- and long-term outcomes, and identify prehepatectomy factors associated with survival, following rehepatectomy (RH) for recurrence. Methods: We conducted a multi-institutional cohort study of hepatectomy for CRLM over 2006–2013. Second-stage resections were excluded. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) assessed using Kaplan–Meier methods. Secondary outcomes included 30-day overall morbidity and mortality, and survival from recurrence. Outcomes of RH and initial hepatectomy (IH) were compared. Results: Of 2771 hepatectomies included in the study, 447 were RH. Median operative time, 30-day morbidity, mortality, and median length of stay did not differ for RH and IH. Five-year OS did not statistically differ, i.e. 56.5 % from RH and 67.6 % from IH [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.9, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.5–1.7], and 5-year RFS was inferior after RH (18.5 vs. 28.8 %; adjusted HR 1.3, 95 % CI 1.0–1.7). In patients who eventually recurred, 5-year survival from the time of recurrence did not differ whether it was after RH (46.5 %) or after IH (60.3 %) (adjusted HR 1.1, 95 % CI 0.8–1.8). Rectal primary tumor (HR 1.4, 95 % CI 1.0–2.1) and metastasis ≥3 cm (HR 1.3, 95 % CI 1.1–2.7) were independently associated with RFS, but not OS, after RH. Conclusion: Short-term outcomes of RH did not differ from IH. While recurrence was more frequent after RH than IH, it did not impact OS. Survival from the time of recurrence did not differ whether recurrence occurred after RH or after IH. CRLM recurrence can be treated with curative intent with excellent long-term outcomes.

Objectives: Multicenter studies comparing the reverse strategy (RS) with the classical strategy (CS) for the management of stage IVA liver-only colorectal cancer (CCR) are scarce. The aim of this study was to compare long-term survival and recurrence patterns following use of the CS and RS. Method: This retrospective multicenter review collected data from all consecutive patients with stage IVA liver-only CCR who underwent staged resection of CCR and liver metastases (LM) at 24 French hospitals between 2006 and 2013 and were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who underwent simultaneous liver and CCR resection, those with synchronous extrahepatic metastasis, and those who underwent emergent CCR resection were excluded. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates and recurrence patterns were investigated before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Results: A total of 653 patients were included: 587 (89.9%) in the CS group and 66 (10.1%) in the RS group. Compared with the CS patients, RS patients were more likely to have rectal cancer (43.9 vs. 24.9%; p = 0.006), larger liver tumor size (52.5 ± 38.6 vs. 39.6 ± 30 mm; p = 0.01), and more positive lymph nodes (62.1 vs. 44.8%; p = 0.009). OS was not different between the two groups (75 vs. 72% at 5 years; p = 0.77), while RFS was worse in the RS group (24 vs. 33% at 5 years; p = 0.01). Time to recurrence at any site (1.8 vs. 2.4 years, p = 0.024) and intrahepatic recurrence (1.7 vs. 2.2 years, p = 0.014) were significantly shorter in the RS group than in the CS group. After PSM (63 patients in each group), no significant difference was found between the two groups in OS (p = 0.35), RFS (p = 0.62), time to recurrence at any site (p = 0.19), or intrahepatic recurrence (p = 0.13). Conclusions: In this study, approximately 10% of patients with CCR and synchronous LM were offered surgery with the RS. Both strategies ensured similar oncological outcomes.

Introduction: While uptake of laparoscopic hepatectomy has improved, evidence on laparoscopic re-hepatectomy (LRH) for colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) is limited and has never been compared to the open approach. We sought to define outcomes of LRH compared to open re-hepatectomy (ORH). Methods: Patients undergoing re-hepatectomy for CRLM at 39 institutions (2006–2013) were identified. Primary outcomes were 30-day post-operative overall morbidity, mortality, and length of stay. Secondary outcomes were recurrence and survival at latest follow-up. LRHs were matched to ORHs (1:3) using a propensity score created by comparing pre-operative clinicopathologic factors (number and size of liver metastases and major hepatectomy). Results: Of 376 re-hepatectomies included, 27 were LRH, including 1 (3.7%) conversion. The propensity-matched cohort included 108 patients. Neither median operative time (252 vs. 230 min; p = 0.82) nor overall 30-day morbidity (48.1 vs. 38.3%; p = 0.37) differed. Non-specific morbidity (including cardiac, respiratory, infectious, and renal events) decreased with LRH (11.1 vs. 30.9%, p = 0.04), while surgical-specific morbidity, including liver insufficiency, was higher (44.4 vs. 22.2%, p = 0.03). One ORH and 0 LRH suffered 30-day mortality. Median length of stay (9 vs. 12 days; p = 0.60) was comparable. At latest follow-up, 26 (96.3%) LRH and 67 (82.7%) ORH patients were alive. Eight (29.6%) LRH and 36 (44.4%) ORH patients were alive without disease. Conclusion: LRH for recurrent CRLM was associated with overall short-term outcomes comparable to ORH, but different morbidity profiles. While it may offer a safe and feasible approach, further insight is necessary to better define patient selection.

Background. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an indication for liver resection or transplantation (LT). In most centers, patients whose HCC meets the Milan criteria are considered for LT. The first objective of this study was to analyze whether there is a correlation between the pathologic characteristics of the tumor, survival and recurrence rate. Second, we focused our attention on vascular invasion (VI). Methods. From January 1997 to December 2007, a total of 196 patients who had a preoperative diagnosis of HCC were included. The selection criteria for LT satisfied both the Milan and the San Francisco criteria (UCSF). Demographic, clinical, and pathologic information were recorded. Results. HCC was confirmed in 168 patients (85.7%). The median follow-up was 74 months. The pathologic findings showed that 106 patients (54.1%) satisfied the Milan criteria, 134 (68.4%) the UCSF criteria of whom 28 (14.3%) were beyond the Milan criteria but within the UCSF criteria, and 34 (17.3%) beyond the UCSF criteria. VI was detected in 41 patients (24%). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 90%, 85%, and 77%, respectively, according to the Milan criteria and 90%, 83%, and 76%, respectively, according to the UCSF criteria (P = NS). In univariate and multivariate analyses, tumor size and VI were significant prognostic factors affecting survival (P<0.001). Two factors were significantly associated with VI: alfa-fetoprotein level of >400 ng/ml and tumor grade G3. Conclusions. Tumor size and VI were the only significant prognostic factors affecting survival of HCC patients. Primary liver resection could be a potential selection treatment before LT

Objective The aim of this study is to evaluate whether a parenchymal-sparing strategy provides similar results in terms of morbidity, mortality, and oncological outcome of non-PSH hepatectomies in a propensity score matched population (PSMP) in case of multiple (>3) bilobar colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Background The surgical treatment of bilobar liver metastasis is challenging due to the necessity to achieve complete resection margins and a sufficient future remnant liver. Two approaches are adaptable as follows: parenchymal-sparing hepatectomies (PSH) and extended hepatectomies (NON-PSH). Methods A total of 3036 hepatectomies were analyzed from a multicentric retrospective cohort of hepatectomies. Patients were matched in a 1:1 propensity score analysis in order to compare PSH versus NON-PSH resections. Results PSH was associated with a lower number of complications (≥1) (25% vs. 34%, p = 0.04) and a lower grade of Dindo-Clavien III and IV (10 vs. 16%, p = 0.03). Liver failure was less present in PSH (2 vs. 7%, p = 0.006), with a shorter ICU stay (0 day vs. 1 day, p = 0.004). No differences were demonstrated in overall and disease-free survival. Conclusion In conclusion, PSH resection for bilobar multiple CLMs represents a valid alternative to NON-PSH resection in selected patients with a reduced morbidity and comparable oncological results.